One-star Google review ‘revenge’ for rent dispute, jewellers say

The Harrises are taking defamation action, along with fellow owner and family member Marc Salzmann, claiming that the review harmed their business and damaged their reputation.

One of the owners of the jewellery store, Marc Selzmann.

They say Ramaihi’s review followed a dispute over the amount of rent they were paying during the COVID-19 lockdowns, which led to a reduction ordered by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal because of financial hardship.

The VCAT order, handed down in December 2020 and provided to The Sunday Age, shows that the tenancy agreement was halved from $4777 a month to $2390.

The store owners claim that Ramaihi was not a customer of the business and there were no records of him being given a quote.

“The plaintiffs track all quotes and sales via the point-of-sale system for Micheli Jewellery,” court documents state.

“There are no records of Hassan Ramaihi patronising Micheli Jewellery, nor of having provided a quote to him.”

In his defence document, Ramaihi admitted posting the review but denied that it was defamatory. He also claimed the review was true and an opinion based on his experiences.

The Essendon apartment that was the subject of the rent dispute.

The Essendon apartment that was the subject of the rent dispute.Credit:Domain

Ramaihi stated that he was given the quote while completing routine maintenance works at the Essendon apartment in November 2019, when he claimed he asked Mr Harris about the cost of cleaning and polishing a wedding ring.

He also argued that the business owners were not seriously harmed by the review, as there were others who had made complaints on Google.

In their court reply to Ramaihi’s defence, the owners of Micheli Jewellery said the landlord had a “personal animus” against Elvi and Darren Harris. The lease agreement ended in March 2021.

Micheli Jewellery claims to have had a drop in turnover of $22,000 in the two months after the review was published.


“Bottom line, he never got a quote from us as stated and used Google reviews as a way to get revenge and hurt us financially,” Darren Harris told The Sunday Age.

“That’s what I believe may have occurred anyway, we will let the court decide if they agree or not.”

The business owners are seeking damages, including aggravated damages, over the review, which is still viewable online.

Ramaihi declined to comment.

The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.

Source link

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply